logo euit

Quality enhancement - International peer review/ authors: Rona Howard, Ann Carnduff

Creator: Howard R..
Creators: Carnduff A. | ENOTHE.
Material type: TextTextSeries: Occupational Therapy Education in Europe.Publisher: Amsterdam: ENOTHE, 2004Description: 1.Content type: text Media type: sense mediació Carrier type: volumISBN: 9080581755.Subject(s): Avaluació | Ensenyament de Teràpia Ocupacional | Europa | Teràpia Ocupacional | IntercanviSummary: Aim of the book influenced by The Bologna Declaration (June 1999) and its follow-up, which itself supported the general principles laid down by the Sorbonne Declaration (May 1998). The objectives of this project were to: review and enhancement of occupational therapy education in Europe therapy education in Higher Education Institutions in Europe occupational therapy education review tool. This book is both a report of the set up and course of the project as well as the intended tool, to be used by institutions and/or agencies who wish to participate in the peer review process. respectively Review Guidelines and Review Handbook. This part is the above mentioned tool. The Review Guidelines chapter has a more general approach. It discusses for instance responsibility and confidentiality issues, and the nature and purpose of a self-evaluation document. The Review Handbook chapter could be considered the actual guide; very useful also are the five summary reports of ENOTHE peer review visits that are attached to it in the third paragraph. project. Six institutions from different European countries were selected to engage in the project. First, the institution made a self-evaluation using the ENOTHE Curriculum Guidelines as a benchmark. This document was then forwarded to a team of three reviewers. Four weeks later the team made a three-day visit to the institution, gathering information about the teaching methods in several interviews and meetings. This information was then laid down in a report, identifying strengths and good practice and giving considerations for future development. From the start it was intended that this would be a developmental rather than a judgmental approach. promises, or in other words, lists possible obstacles and pitfalls of external academic peer review as well as possible benefits. It also indicates why on the whole the peer review process was considered a positive experience by the host institutions, and a thing to be promoted and recommended to other institutions.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Powered by Koha